See Books on Theoretical Physics
>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE TO THE NEXT
SCIENCE ARTICLE IN THE SERIES<
>CLICK HERE TO GO TO THE PREVIOUS SCIENCE ARTICLE IN THE SERIES<
>CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO THE LIST OF SCIENCE ARTICLES<
Question: What is straight (nearly) and goes in every direction?
Answer: A place called space, which would be gone forever were it not
for an eternal constancy called time."
THE DIMENSIONS OF NATURE
Imagine the term
“parallel dimension.” It is utilized frequently in fiction as a literary
convenience for stories requiring metaphysical or extra-natural explanations
for events occurring in the story. Indeed, anyone who has ever watched
television has at very least, heard the term mentioned before. It has been
utilized so frequently that many might find it a perfectly meaningful
convention for specifying some sort of alternate “plane of existence"
(many even to the point of embracing this purely fictional invention as being
an actual physical possibility).
Though the notion of
other distinct physical realities besides our seemingly single shared one
existing alongside ours may be a great literary convenience for the sake of
expressing the vague notions that fictional writing may necessarily require,
associating the term ‘parallel’ as an adjective for the mathematical and/or
scientific term ‘dimension’ is never – nor can it ever be – anything more than
a ‘fictional’ tool. It serves the needs of the writer at the time, but
nonetheless remains a stark contradiction to what a dimension really is.
In the mathematical
terms that science uses, ‘shapes’, like one-dimensional lines, two-dimensional
surfaces, and even actual three-dimensional spaces in a four-dimensional
reality (like our reality is) can in fact be parallel. However, 'shapes' being
parallel is one thing, does not mean that dimensions can be. They cannot. (It
should be noted that this restriction excludes and therefore does not apply to
parallel actual realities of the omni-verse or multi-verse, which are simply
very complex shapes, both existing in “parallel” in a matter of speaking, as
'shapes' – but again not dimensions – do.)
Instead of parallel,
dimensions are what is the exact opposite of parallel and best described, for
the sake of this discussion, by use of the term ‘perpendicular’. (In more
precise scientific terms, the designation ‘orthogonal’ applies, of which
perpendicular is just a single, unique case, among an infinity of other
orientations.
One line intersecting
another is an example of orthogonal; there is only a single orientation at
which two lines can intersect perpendicularly, many in which two lines can
intersect and be orthogonal. Two orthogonal lines crossing at a single point
create a plane. A third line is orthogonal to these two orthogonal lines when
it intersects at a single point the plane created by two orthogonal lines. A
fourth line is orthogonal to three orthogonal lines when it intersects at a
single point the three-dimensional space created by the three orthogonal lines.
This last idea is critical to start understanding, however vague that
understanding might be, that is, that a line can intersect a space at a single
point.
The number of
dimensions is always a whole, positive number. This number corresponds to the
number of perpendicular lines that there can be.
What do dimensions “do”? Answer:
provide more “room,” infinitely more, with each additional dimension that there
is. The room provided allows all ‘lying’ within such room to be distinguished,
each individual anything from anything else, by means of unique location. Any
dimension is the same as any other. As relativity reveals, time, in this sense
then, is no different from space – each is a manifestation of the same ‘thing’
– a thing that we call dimension.
Dimensions in nature
can be described precisely, in mathematical terms, but, because we are
utilizing descriptions exclusive of any such terms as much as is possible, we
only describe dimensions in conceptual ones. This is what dimensions are for
us.
In every direction, a
single dimension is a straight line that is perpendicular to all other
dimensions, as straight lines. Any
direction, as a straight line, in the three-dimensional space we see around us,
is always perpendicular to two other lines (directions) in space, meaning that
three perpendicular lines, each of which is perpendicular to the other two,
like the three lines forming the corner of a room (like your jail or prison
cell, or classroom), define three-dimensional space.
Time, which relativity assumes to be a
dimension no different from space, is therefore, a line perpendicular to any
three perpendicular lines in three-dimensional space. This means that time is a
line perpendicular to each of the three spatial dimensions (ignoring how
difficult such a notion might be to truly imagine). The dimension of time,
therefore, in four dimensions, is a fourth
line perpendicular to anything (any
point) in three-dimensional space.
Although time and space may appear, due to
the nature of our existence, to be two completely different things (the former
being motion, the latter being spatial distance), as relativity considers them,
they are not two different things, but the identical thing. In other words, any
distance in space that you might imagine, is as much a distance in time as it
is a distance in space. To be very precise, what is purely our space in every
direction at any distance becomes in part -- however small that part might be
-- time instead of space for something moving, as odd or unfamiliar as the idea
of space being time can seem. It is what space and time are: the very same
thing, inseparable and identical.
Gaining
an understanding of what a physical dimension is and equally important, what a
physical dimension is not nor can ever be --
parallel -- is the foundation upon which an extremely useful tool for
understanding and explaining nature is based. It is a tool that is absolutely
essential to accurately understanding how the world works, and in particular,
appreciating the richness of its space and time by accurately modeling the
marvels of its energy. The amazing tool that does all this is a tool called
'geometry'; a tool that we use all the time, albeit unknowingly, even in our
dreams.
Although we may not be aware of it, we
can't help but use geometry constantly in our thoughts, for the simple reason that either we ourselves
move, everything around us moves, or both. This means that we always use
geometry, albeit unknowingly, in the contemplation of our own motions and of
those occurring around us. Geometry is inescapable; inseparable from normal
human experience. And, not only do we use it, but so does nature too, in everything.
The geometry that
nature uses has a formal expression in the language of science. We are using
only the conceptual expression of that formal description here, not the
mathematical one. This is why all we need to know to understand dimensions for
our purposes is the concept of 'perpendicular', and how to count one by one the
number of perpendicular lines possible at a single point. The number of
perpendicular lines possible at a single point is the number of dimensions for
the geometry.
Understanding what a
dimension is is essential for grasping geometry conceptually, as we must do to
understand science's best description of nature, the Theory of Relativity (for
space and time) and the Theory of Quantum Mechanics (for energy). Moreover, we must begin by imagining
geometry in four dimensions, instead
of the usual three to which we are ordinarily so accustomed. However, this is
not as difficult as it might at first seem, because we can “trim” the number of
dimensions while maintaining the character of the geometric properties through
analogy.
As the prior science
articles have revealed, there are geometric “tricks” for simplifying the
complicated – for example, analogizing the rising surface of a pond to time's
constant passage in the article “Relativity in Ten Minutes,” or complicating
the 'tilting' of the rising surfaces from this article into the 'bending'
surfaces described in the article “Bending Space-Time and Gravity.” These
tricks can make the intangibly abstract clear and easy to grasp.
We have and will continue to use geometric
“tricks” like these (i.e. analogies), as there are many such tricks that we can
use to great effect. We shall use them whenever we can in the articles that
follow. Hopefully, the reader will develop a more accurate understanding of
nature than would ordinarily be available to him or her, by a most unlikely
means: through a homeless newspaper.
>CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE TO THE NEXT
SCIENCE ARTICLE IN THE SERIES<
>CLICK HERE TO GO TO THE PREVIOUS SCIENCE ARTICLE IN THE SERIES<
>CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO THE LIST OF SCIENCE ARTICLES<
See Books on Theoretical Physics
© 2008 Chongo
All rights reserved.